requestId:684c3e1b1e4130.86238769.
The “New Mind” structure of the Donglin School
——A new perspective on the transformation of international philosophical science in the Ming and Qing Dynasties
Author: Chen Yang (Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tongji University Humanities)
Source: “Zhongshan University of Science and Technology. Social Science Edition”, 2020 Issue 3
Time: Kong The first day of the fourth month of Gengzi in the year 2570, Bingyin
� Among them, the “inner logic” of Yu Mu and Yu Yingshi said that the source of thinking itself has better interpretation. Through the analysis of the “new mind” construction process of the Eastern Lin School, we can transform the Ming and Qing dynasties from the “scientific transformation” perspective to the “philosophical transformation” perspective, and better explore the thinking potential of the “inner theory” paradigm. The three stages of the ideological development of the Donglin School completely show the ideological process of the transformation of the Ming and Qing dynasties. From the perspective of theoretical focus – theory, mind and nature, and kung fu theory, it reminds the inner development of the Donglin school of thought and development in mechanism and clarifying its origin is a new perspective to explore the transformation of the international philosophical philosophical theory between the Ming and Qing dynasties.
Keywords: Donglin School; Not working hard; philosophy shifting
Regarding the academic transformation of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, there are many disagreements in the academic world. According to the summary of the researchers, there are four types of related research: one is Liang Qichao and Hu Yang’s “reaction of science”, the second is the “revolution of science” of Mo Mu and Yu Yingshi’s “everything is better and better” and “internal theory” of Hou Wai-shou and Zhilifu, and the fourth is the “latest enlightenment” of modern neo-Confucianism. [1] Among them, the “inner theory” of Master Yu said that the source of thinking itself has better interpretation. This article uses the East Lin School of the late Ming Dynasty as an example to explore the transformation of the international philosophical science between the Ming and Qing dynasties. The important thing is that it is caused by the monumental view. For example, Liang Qichao and Jiu Mu wrote two works of the same name, “The History of Academic in the Last Three Hundred Years of China”, and Liang Qichao believed that this transformation was a tiredness and reaction to the “mind meditation” of Song and Ming dynasties; Jiu Mu Mu pointed out from the perspective of combining the transformation of academic transformation and the development of social history, and pointed out that science and Han in the Qing Dynasty were a whole, and there was an internal connection between “like a scattered nature, with its own stubbornness”. Interestingly, Liang Qichao believed that the various “reflections on science” that appeared in the last twenty or thirty years of the late Ming Dynasty gave birth to the Qing Dynasty academic practice, and pointed out that Huang Zongxi’s “The Confucian Case of Ming Dynasty” did not show the news in it in its entirety. Money Muji used the “Ming Confucian Case: Donglin Case” as the basis, and stated that “the style of learning in the early Qing Dynasty came out of Donglin” and clearly pointed out the 大学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学学a>The virtual distinction and the distinction between the physical skill were exactly the beginning of the new trend of academic practice in the early Qing Dynasty. [2] Liang Qichao’s “reflection on science” is beyond the intrinsic and lacks the complex details of the Ming and Qing dynasties to cover and describe the Ming and Qing dynasties; while the Donglin School of Science and Technology was regarded as the “New Year after the beginning”, thus proposing the reversal of the “International Science and Technology” of the Ming and Qing dynasties, which better demonstrated the internal logic of the development of the Ming and Qing dynasties. In summary, there are two main insights of Momo: one is to point out that the thinking of the Donglin School has the main meaning in the research and discussion of the international academic transformation in the Ming and Qing Dynasties; the other is to point out that Huang Zongxi’s “The Confucian Case of Ming and Confucianism” has a clear explanation of the problems of the international academic transformation in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, which is absolutely inconsistent.
However, the important thing about Yu Mu’s research is to draw the connection between the Eastern Lin School and the early Qing Dynasty’s academic style based on the comparison of academic descriptions and views; we need to further advance our thinking in the philosophy of philosophy. Because the core of Song and Ming Philosophy is the metaphysical study of the mind and nature, it is not enough to explain the academic direction only from the connection between the style of learning; it must move from the perspective of “scientific transformation” to the “philosophical transformation”, that is, the internal mechanism of reminding the transformation from the perspective of theoretical focus – theory, mind and nature theory, and kung fu theory. This is the most basic explanation, and can better explore the thinking potential of the “internal theory path” paradigm. Because of this, this article will take advantage of Huang Zongxi’s guidance in “The Confucian School of Ming Dynasty·The Donglin School of Donglin School” to further remind the Donglin School of philosophical achievements and the international philosophical studies of Ming and Qing dynasties to turn to the internal mechanism.
1. Unemployed kung fu: a practical discrimination
The Donglin School discussed in this article is a philosophical school that focuses on politeness, high climax, and Sun Shen’s actions proposed by Huang Zongxi in the “Ming Confucian Confucian Case: Donglin School”. The area is different from the Donglin Party, which is a political faction in the late Ming Dynasty. With his in-depth insight into thinking and history, Huang Zongxi pointed out that “this is why Donglin’s learning was guided by Yang (note: Gujing Cheng) and Jing Yi (note: Gao Panlong) began to go further, and he gathered it together with the teacher and teacher (note: Sun Shenxing).” [3] Huang Zongxi’s views have rich thoughts and are extremely meaningful. The following article will follow Huang Zongxi’s guidance to systematically explore the philosophical contributions of the Donglin School.
As mentioned above, from the perspective of the history of academic thinking, the style of Donglin School that emphasizes the realization of Kung Fu and returns from virtual (virtual knowledge) to real (real knowledge) is inherently related to the style of the early Qing Dynasty. If we want to carefully evaluate why the philosophical transformation of “self-nature reason to turn to history” in the Qing Dynasty is enough, we also need to deeply understand the core of the Donglin School’s Kung Fu Discussion. In other words, the Kung Fu of the Donglin School was the extension and development of the Jiangyou King’s unemployed kung fu, and made extremely creative advances. Why did the King of Jiangyou not find any success and see her doing a good job? Song Wei handed the cat to her and felt a little relieved. husband? This starts with the Yang Mingxin Teaching. Yang Ming said to his confidant: “A confidant is just a natural and clear discovery of the law of nature, just a true heart, that is,It’s his body. ”[4] This sentence expresses the rational basis of Yangming’s fate of “mind is reason” and “outside the mind is unreasonable”. Natural wisdom refers to the immorality of the original intention and conscience, and the basic principle cannot be used to describe the laws of nature. Mou Zongsan pointed out incisively that the laws of nature mentioned by Yangming are not inner abstract principles, but from href=”https://twbabydating99.com/”>Inclusive contractThe true and honest heart is naturally presented; therefore, the confidant clearly believes that it can be related to the “nature principle” and the “action”. The famous “unity of knowledge and action” is the product of this thinking: the action is clear and observable without being blind and crazy, which means that the clear knowledge is in the “action”. In this sense, the knowledge of the confidant is not the knowledge of the object’s view of the inner principles, but the determination of an appropriate person internally and independently The principle of how to act (nature). The object that a confidant sees is not the inner principles, but the principles that it determines and presents. [5] In short, the confidant’s discovery and behavior is naturally in line with the order of things itself (in nature), and is absolutely unrestrained and indifferent The cont
發佈留言